
| SpinFreeNews.com Join us for news uncluttered by spin and media bias. |
BanzhafWatch.com Keeping an eye on the man who wants to sue America! |
ff.org Policy, politics, and more from a cutting-edge think tank. |
Rachel Neuwirth
Why is it that people are proposing a Middle East peace plan that will make Judea and Samaria Judenrein (the Nazi term for a place with no Jews)?
This is the historic homeland and birthplace of the Jewish people, yet many world leaders--including American presidents--believe that the removal of Jewish communities from Judea and Samaria is a crucial prerequisite for a peaceful resolution to the Arab-Israeli conflict. Unfortunately, every Israeli Prime Minister has been pressured to follow this policy.
Jews have lived in Judea and Samaria for thousands of years. In fact the Jewish religion and people were birthed in Hebron. We know of the ancient Jewish presence there from both the Hebrew and Christian Bibles and from abundant archaeological and documentary evidence.
No one denies that the oldest document showing the historical connection of the Jewish people to the land of Israel, including Judea and Samaria (a.k.a. the West Bank), is the Bible. Genesis 24:18 says: ''And Abram moved his tent, and came and dwelt by the terebinths of Mamre, which are in Hebron.''
Also, the world's oldest documentation of real estate being purchased by paying the full price is also in the Bible. (See Genesis 23:9.) And for those who doubt biblical references, there is substantial evidence in archaeological findings:
http://www.sciencedaily.com/encyclopedia/History\_of\_ancient\_Israel\_and\_Judah
Historically, the Jewish homeland included what is today called Judea and Samaria or the West Bank, the Golan Heights, and a considerable part of today's Jordan. The land was inhabited mainly by Jews and was ruled by Jews. Therefore, Lord Robert Cecil, former acting British foreign secretary, was right to use the name ''Judea'' for the whole land in his famous remark: ''Our wish is that Arabian countries shall be for the Arabs, Armenia for the Armenians, and Judea for the Jews'' (December 2, 1917): http://www.esek.com/jerusalem/iudaea.html
The Jewish presence there has been continuous, except for 19 years from 1948 to 1967 when the area became Judenrein. And during that 19-year period, the Jordanians and Arabs of the remaining portion of ''Palestine'' desecrated Jewish holy sites and cemeteries in an attempt to deny that the Jews EVER lived there.
Those who advocate the dismantling of the Jewish communities in this territory are advocating a policy of ethnic cleansing. This may sound extreme, but from the early 1900s the Arabs carried out a policy of ethnic cleansing that included the massacre and pogroms in 1929 and 1936 in Hebron, and both the spirit and practice of ethnic cleansing are being continued in the current conflict: http://www.palestinefacts.org/pf\_mandate\_grand\_mufti.php
So, what did U.N. Secretary-General Kofi Anan mean in his 2001 Nobel Peace Prize acceptance speech when he said, ''A genocide begins with the killing of one man—not for what he has done, but because of who he is. A campaign of 'ethnic cleansing' begins with one neighbor turning on another.''
Does this not also apply to the Israeli Jews who have re-established homes in Judea and Samaria? Should they be ethnically cleansed from the heart of their historical homeland? Does the Nobel recipient not know a real victim of ethnic cleansing when he sees one?
The same people and countries that condemned ethnic cleansing in the Balkans, Cyprus, Rwanda, and Tibet, totally reverse themselves when it comes to the right of Jewish people to live in their historic patrimony.
If Chinese people were forbidden to live in China, Buddhists barred from Tibet, or Irish-Catholics banned from South Boston, there would be a tremendous outcry against such injustices. But where is the outcry against the removal of Jews from Judea—their historical homeland?
Is there any other nation on earth that has such a legitimate birth certificate as Israel? If not, then the Old and New Testaments are worthless documents.
After Israel's war of independence, Jordan illegally occupied Judea and Samaria and the Old city of Jerusalem, making the official status of these areas disputed territories as no one had held sovereignty there since the defeat of the Ottoman Empire.
However, after the 1967 war, the Jewish people have simply been returning to the land from which they were forcibly expelled during the first Arab-Israeli war of 1948-49.
The war for Israel's independence ended in 1949 with the Jordanians in full control of Judea and Samaria and the Old City of Jerusalem (the ''West Bank''), cutting the Jewish people off from their most holy religious sites. The official status of these areas, then, was disputed territories, as no one had held sovereigntythere since the deafeat of the Ottoman Empire. Only two countries, Pakistan and Britain, recognized this 19-year Jordanian ''illegal occupation!'' Even the entire Arab world refused to recognize it and consequently, it was illegal and illegitimate ab initio.
This territory has always been known as Judea and Samaria. Do the names ''Jew'' (for Judea) and ''Samaritan'' (as in ''good Samaritan'') sound familiar? In fact, Shemer, founder of Asher, a clan of one of the twelve tribes of Israel, was the owner and eponym of the hills of Samaria. Is there anything Arab or ''Palestinian'' about either? Even U.N. Resolution 181, the Partition Plan of 1947, refers to these territories as Judea and Samaria: http://www.yale.edu/lawweb/avalon/mideast/mideast.htm
The word ''occupiers'' does not apply to the Jews. Prior to the illegal Jordanian occupation of 1948-67, Jews had maintained several thousand years of continual residence in the area. It does apply to both the Jordanians and the ''Palestinian'' Arab squatters of today! http://www.tzemachdovid.org/Facts/islegal1.shtml
In the early part of the 20th century, the Arab population carried out a war against the Jewish inhabitants resulting in a series of massacres in Hebron, the birth place of Judaism, in 1929 as well as numerous other violent attacks such as the 1936-39 pogroms against Jews, ending in the total expulsion of the Jewish population from much of Judea, Samaria, and the Old City of Jerusalem.
As a result of the Israeli victory in 1967, Jewish people returned to this area and re-unified the historic capital of Jerusalem. Many of the Jews who had been expelled from this territory or whose parents and grandparents were murdered by rampaging Arabs, have merely returned to their previous homes.
And in subsequent years, additional Jewish COMMUNITIES (not ''illegal settlements'') were built mainly for security purposes, and others for historical and emotional reasons on mainly state-owned land and historical outposts.
Judea and Samaria (the so-called ''West Bank'') were LIBERATED, not stolen or occupied, from Jordan: http://www.tzemachdovid.org/Facts/islegal3.shtml and http://www.internationalwallofprayer.org/A-143-A-Settlers-History-of-Settlements
Since 1967, 261 new Arab settlements have been built in Judea and Samaria/the West Bank. According to international law, all of these are illegal as no sovereignty was ever recognized over these territories; yet no one calls for their removal. Why is it that no one talks about those Arab settlements as obstacles to peace—especially when they are bases for carrying out terrorism, and their inhabitants are constantly taught virulent hatred toward the Jewish people and the West?
Dismantling the Jewish communities in these territories will only reward terrorism.
The Jewish communities in Judea and Samaria, are a litmus test of Arab intentions. Why can’t Jews live in their historic homeland if there really is peace? After all, there are 1.2 million Arabs living as citizens of Israel in the one Jewish country in the world while there are only a handful of Jews living in any of the 22 Arab countries.
In fact, in Jordan and Saudi Arabia, not only is it illegal for Jews to be citizens, they are not even allowed to live there!
Therefore, instead of Israel being the ''apartheid state'' in the region, it is the Arab world that is not only apartheid but also racist and religiously exclusive.
Rachel Neuwirth is a freelance writer who makes her home in Los Angeles.
Home |
Featured Writers |
Guest Writers |
Freedom Writers |
Contact |
Terms |
Message Boards |
FAQ |
Submit

OpinionEditorials.com is brought to you by Frontiers of Freedom
This site is provided as an educational service of Frontiers of Freedom (FOF). The ideas and opinions expressed
© 2002 - 2003 Frontiers of Freedom |
All rights reserved |
Terms and Conditions
herein do not necessarily reflect the thought or opinions of FOF or its officers, staff, or directors.![]()