
Stephen Lodge
Think about it. Great Britain, and to an extent our neighbor to the north Canada, have literally given up their guns. The same is true of Australia. The anti-gunners – organized groups, certain U.S. politicians, select members of Congress, many foreign governments, plus the United Nations – continue to hack away at the U.S. Constitution’s 2nd Amendment every chance they can. These determined gun-haters have popped up in every free and civilized country in the world. Their aim: to rid the world (they say) of any and all deadly weapons by first forcing restrictions, then eventually banning every gun – rifle and pistol alike – belonging to hunters, sportsmen, and decent citizens – those of us who only keep a gun for self defense. We all know these fools are going after the wrong gun-owners, and that they should be preaching their so called “peaceful” objectives to the criminal element instead. Yet they continue to press their counterfactual agenda against those of us who only want to protect our lives, the lives of our families, and if called upon, our precious country.
We all know criminals get their weapons in ways this tightly organized faction cannot seem to comprehend – or so we think. I used to believe that they continued to attack lawful gun-owners because going after the real bad guys was completely out of their scope. Everyone who reads this piece has heard the argument over and over, I’m sure of it. Even so, I have come up with what some will call a “conspiracy theory” way before this story ever goes main-stream.
Here it is:
From what can be observed every day through television news shows, newspapers, and the like, it appears that every single Middle Eastern male has his own, personal sub-machine-gun. And they fire it at will whenever they feel like it. Every photo taken on the Arab street shows these people with their automatic weapons, some slung over shoulders, others carried in the same way Western businessmen do their briefcase. They are everywhere, these personal side-arms – a regular citizen army if need be.
Maybe you’ve noticed: there is something very important missing in these Middle Eastern countries. The anti-gun organizations. Where are the anti-gunners? Those organized anti-gun groups, the certain U.S. politicians, the select members of Congress, the many foreign governments, and the United Nations? That’s right – they are nowhere to be seen, are they? My question is – Why? Could it be these anti-gunners are in collusion with the Islamofascist terrorists with whom we are now at war? Why else are free countries being targeted by the gun-haters and not the countries where everyone keeps an automatic weapon beside their bed? Is there some kind of world-wide conspiracy going on? A secret compact among the anti-gunners that says, “Take away the free world’s guns so when the enemy eventually invades they will have nothing to fight back with.” Is that it?
Something got me thinking recently about everything that has led up to this point in time. The politically correct movement; the left-wing teachings in our public schools and universities; the rewriting of our wonderful American history; the promotion of actions that were once thought to be degenerate; our declining morals; the making of restitution to those countries who were once our enemies, in particular the one who started World War II with their attack on Pearl Harbor; inaction regarding attacks on Americans in foreign countries; the 1993 bombing of the World Trade Center; 9/11, plus the anti-gun movement that seemed to hit the entire free world at about the same time. I could go on and on but I think most of you get the idea.
Take them all – the anti-gun groups, George Soros, select members of the Democrat party, some of our local politicians, foreign governments, certain members of our Congress, and the United Nations. Could these individual groups have possibly formed an alliance of some sort with the aim to immobilize the free world’s citizen soldier? Think on this. Iran nukes Israel, Israel retaliates. Enter the United States to protect its friend; followed by Russia defending their friends. Then, let’s say, we lose. Our country is defeated somehow, and foreign armies are about to invade our country. What can the average citizen do if they are not armed? More than likely just throw up our hands in surrender – admit defeat because this conglomeration of anti-gunners has supported the enemy from the very beginning.
It’s only my theory, this little scenario, but it certainly could happen if these anti-gun, anti-American zealots get away with their little plot. Even if these gun-haters and the enemy are not in the same boat, it doesn’t really matter. A country without armed citizens will always be endangered.
Again I ask the reader to ponder the connection I have presented. Then ask yourself why everything appears to have led up to what is happening in the world today. The enemy – whoever they may be – has softened the beaches for invasion through legal, though subversive means. There is still time to stop them. But this is just my theory. It couldn’t really be true. Could it?
Home |
Featured Writers |
Guest Writers |
Freedom Writers |
Contact |
Terms |
FAQ |
Submit

OpinionEditorials.com is brought to you by Frontiers of Freedom
This site is provided as an educational service of Frontiers of Freedom (FOF).
© 2002 - 2004 Frontiers of Freedom |
All rights reserved |
Terms and Conditions
![]()